One of the reasons a married woman could maintain her  independence was her dowry, since it was her uncontested property with no  strings attached. If a divorce occurred, the dowry was hers to take back to her  father's house, or to buy her own home or business. But that did not leave the  poorer woman at the mercy of her husband, either. In most cases, even if the  bride did not bring a sizable dowry, a clause in the marriage contract required  the husband to pay a specific sum of money in case of a divorce. An interesting  marriage contract from the days of King Nebuchadnezzar specifies that if the  husband married a second wife, it would be considered the equivalent of a  divorce from the first wife. The first wife would  get  her full dowry back, with an additional sum of money to compensate her for the  loss of her married state. This document is not unique; polygamy was discouraged  and penalized financially.

A dowry did not have to consist of strictly money. It  could include slaves,  domestic animals, furniture, and household goods. In such  cases, the value of  the people, animals, and objects was carefully calculated  and stated clearly in  the contract. If the father of the bride was dead, or her mother was a well-to-do  divorced  woman, the mother would supply the dowry. If both parents were dead,  another  member of the family would do so. And there were many nuances to family   relationships and responsibilities. For example, another document from the time  of Nebuchadnezzar states that the father of the bride says that the creditors of   the groom’s father should never have a claim on the bride’s dowry, or anything   else that she personally possesses. It is amusing to think that the bride’s   father suspected his new in-law of not being entirely solvent. Why did he  allow  his daughter to marry into a family he suspected of financial trouble  remains  shrouded in the mists of time, but it’s entirely possible that the girl  was in  love and determined to marry this young man. There is nothing new under  the  sun…

 
 
In the  Semitic world, Babylonia was unique in the way it treated women’s rights and  position. Probably due to the early matriarchal society, women often took  precedence over men. Everywhere else women were permitted diverse levels of  autonomy, but were always subordinate to men. Jewish men treated women with  respect, but they were not equal to men. One of the early sovereigns in  Babylonia was Ellat-Gulla, a queen. In neighboring Assyria, the bas-reliefs of  the great king Assur-Bani-Pal, show his queen sitting next to him during a feast  in a place of equal importance. Another major king, Sargon, left a list of trees brought into Babylon from another land; the entire transaction was carried out  by his queen, who clearly was involved in the affairs of the  state.
 
 
I was very happy to see quite a lot of interest in the  role of Shekhina as the female side of God, so I thought that this Sunday I would  present a second representation of her, as Shabbat Hamalka, Queen of the  Sabbath and Bride of God. Next week I will return to the more practical side of  women’s lives in Babylonia and Judea during Hillel’s life and times. The links in red should take you to related articles in Enclyccloped Mythica www.pantheon.org which may be of interest to you, and where this article had appeared first some years ago.

                              Shabbat Hamalka

Among the goddesses representing either the female side of Yahweh or his consorts, such as Asherah, Shekhina, Anath, and Lilith, Shabbat Hamalka has a unique personality  and origin. Her myth strongly influenced Jewish thought, and contributed to the  strength of home and family that had improved the odds for physical and  spiritual Jewish survival.  The name means Queen of the Sabbath, and the entity is the personification of  the Jewish day of rest, Saturday. She still possesses a prominent position in  Judaic mythology. For example, Israeli children, even in completely nonreligious  surroundings, still sing songs to her every Friday afternoon (in Hebrew  "Erev Shabatt" meaning the Sabbath Eve) before the Queen "descends"  from Heaven to grace the world for twenty-four hours. When the Jews started  their return to Palestine, long before the state of Israel was declared, new  mythology had to be created or recreated. Shabbat Hamalka, prominent and  romantic, was one of the first candidates. The great National Poet Chaim Nachman  Bialik, who was an expert on folklore and mythology, had a lot to do with preserving the image of the Queen in the renewed home of the Jewish People. He  invented "Oneg Shabbat," meaning "Sabbath Joy," and combined the  customs of group study, festive dinner, lectures, and singing of both old and  new songs. The custom spread to the United States and is still observed by many.
 
 
While the trickledown theory does not really work for  American economy, it does work very well when it comes to theology -- a nation  is strongly defined by the deity it serves. The God of the Jews, Yahweh, is a  male deity, and the society that worshipped him from the earliest times was patriarchal; women were respected, but were undoubtedly second class citizens. The early  Babylonians were matriarchal and worshipped several female deities, and women had  equal rights. Even later, during the times we are discussing and when  Babylonian culture was influenced by the Semitic culture, women still had  almost equal rights. Their position was very close to that of American women --  not one hundred percent equal, but close enough to make life quite pleasant.

But life for the Jewish  woman was not entirely bleak -- and for that we have to thank a mindset that  created a very interesting entity: Shekhina (also spelled Shekhinah), who is the feninine side of God. To understand the Jewish mind, one must understand the Shekhina. Therefore, before  we delve deeper in women's place in Judea and Babylon, I am attaching an article  that I have written some years ago for the wonderful Encyclopedia Mythica (which I am sure you would enjoy greatly if you go to that site --www.pantheon.org. I  doubt anyone here read this particular article, but if you did, I apologize and I promise to put up  new material next Sunday.